首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of weight, depth, and diagnostic adequacy of specimens obtained with 16 different biopsy forceps designed for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
【2h】

Comparison of weight, depth, and diagnostic adequacy of specimens obtained with 16 different biopsy forceps designed for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

机译:用16种不同的上消化道内窥镜活检钳获得的标本的重量,深度和诊断适当性进行比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The influence of endoscopic forceps variables (size, design, and make) on biopsy specimen weight, depth, and diagnostic adequacy has been studied in vitro on normal human stomach, and in vivo at endoscopy in dog and in patients. Greater pressure during the biopsy procedure yielded significantly heavier, deeper, and histologically more acceptable specimens. Standard sized forceps (diameter 2.4 mm) and those with ellipsoid cups consistently produced larger specimens than the smaller 'paediatric' forceps (1.8 mm) and those with round cups. Deeper specimens were also obtained using the standard forceps. In vitro and in vivo in the dog, the standard sized forceps also produced specimens of greater diagnostic adequacy than the paediatric forceps. At endoscopy in patients, however, we could not detect any influence of the size, shape, and presence of forceps spike or fenestration on the diagnostic adequacy of the specimens.
机译:内窥镜钳变量(大小,设计和制造)对活检标本重量,深度和诊断适当性的影响已在体外在正常人胃中进行了研究,并在内窥镜下在犬和患者体内进行了研究。活检过程中更大的压力会产生更重,更深且组织学上可接受的标本。标准尺寸的镊子(直径2.4毫米)和带有椭圆形杯的镊子始终比较小的“儿科”镊子(1.8毫米)和带有圆形杯的镊子产生更大的标本。使用标准镊子也可以获得更深的样本。在犬的体外和体内,标准尺寸的镊子所产生的标本比小儿镊子具有更大的诊断意义。但是,在患者的内窥镜检查中,我们无法检测到大小,形状以及镊子尖刺或开窗的存在对标本的诊断充分性的任何影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号